Wat is de waarde van purpose marketing?

Net nu je denkt dat je het begrijpt en je vol met je team voor de beleveniseconomie gaat, duikt er een nieuw fenomeen op: purpose marketing. Ondernemingen die niet alleen een belevenis willen aanbieden (immers dat is veel meer waard dan een fysiek goed of een simpele service), maar ineens hun purpose hebben gevonden. Sinek on steroids, zeg maar. Niet alleen eindelijk je missie vinden maar zelfs een ‘purpose’.

Zo ook bijvoorbeeld onlangs de Rabobank nog: ‘Stel je eens voor dat we samen het wereldvoedselprobleem oplossen!’ Maar werkt dit nu? Heeft het zin, is het alleen maar een marketingdingetje, purpose washing of levert het ook echt waarde op voor mens, merk en maatschappij?

Lees deze bijdrage van Ronald Voorn RM op Adformatie

 

De ultieme checklist voor de GDPR

Nu 2018 begonnen is, komt de deadline echt dichtbij. Vanaf 25 mei moeten alle organisaties zich houden aan de nieuwe privacywetgeving: de Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming (AVG / GDPR). Deze wet vervangt de huidige Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens en stelt strengere eisen aan de manier waarop persoonsgegevens worden verwerkt. Voor deel 10 van deze blogserie hebben wij als legal counsels van brancheorganisatie DDMA een ultieme AVG-checklist opgesteld met de 10 belangrijkste punten.

Lees deze blogpost van DDMA op Marketingfacts

 

Brands shift marketing effectiveness focus from justification to learning

Inflation is rising, interest rates are on the up and consumer confidence is on a knife edge, all of which means 2018 will be a difficult year for marketing. Media agency groups including GroupM and Zenith Optimedia have cut their growth forecasts, while the major agency holding groups are seeing revenue growth either slow or decline as advertisers, in particular in FMCG, tighten their belts.

Lees verder op Marketingweek

(Blog Arthur Simonetti – DSM/NIMA B2B) Purpose and core competencies: the new strategic compass!

Are we losing long-term perspective in strategy development?

Door Arthur Simonetti*

Do we still need a long-term vision if our strategic planning cycles are shortening from 5 to 3 years and from 3 to 1 year? How do we make long-term strategic decisions? Or are we moving to tactical decisions only?

Maybe you have also noticed in your own company that creating long-term strategic plans has lost its momentum and importance. Our focus has shifted to shorter time horizons and our management attention has shifted to “how to act faster”, “how to act agilely”, because of all the exponential changes around us. Are we adrift, all at sea, or are we still charting our own course? Strategic plans and planning are no longer our main guides, we must rely on and trust our core beliefs and core strengths, even more than ever before.

Purpose and core competencies drive our strategic decisions, this combination is our compass and our lighthouse.

We still make strategic (long-term) decisions, however without long-term forward-looking strategic plans, these decisions are driven by the “purpose” of the company.

As our short-term strategic decisions are increasingly forced upon us, they require a strong reliance on our core competencies, to ensure we chart our own course rather than let ourselves by swayed by external factors.

Therefore, I am convinced that “purpose-driven” companies are better and faster at making strategic decisions and will outperform their peers. Companies that know their core competencies will be more successful adopting the new exponential developments. In order for the fittest to survive, they must have a well-understood purpose and core competencies.

The devaluation of a long-term strategic plan

Let me be clear, strategy is, for me, not equal to a plan. Strategy is what you do, it is represented by all your actions. In principle, your strategic plan (whether it is articulated or not) is reflected in your actions. “Show me your actions and I will tell you your plan”.

The value of a plan has always been twofold. The first is the “making of”; this helps to get buy-in and alignment on the full picture on the world we are operating in. Secondly, the strategic option chosen serves as a compass for decision-making. But what if the environment changes too rapidly; if new technologies are no longer following Moore’s law but are truly growing exponentially? In this VUCA (Volatile, Uncertain, Complex, and Ambiguous) world a sound external analysis is impossible. Even scenario planning is no longer valid (see box) as there are too many drivers for change.

Purpose: THE distinctive driver of your company

Purpose is the new buzzword in marketing. As with all meaningful concepts it is easily jargonized and abused. I first became aware of the concept of purpose through our marketing guru Philip Kotler, who described this concept in Marketing 3.0. Kotler states: “Marketing is about clearly defining your unique identity and strengthening it with authentic integrity to build a strong image”. “Marketing should no longer be considered as only selling and using tools to generate demand. Marketing should now be considered as the major hope of a company to restore consumer trust”. This is, for me, equivalent to the purpose of a company.

As there is no good definition of purpose marketing, we have developed one together with my friend Ruud Boer for his next edition of the Dutch Brand design book:

“Purpose marketing is connecting your authentic drive to contribute to a better world with the needs of the customers and stakeholders, in order to fulfill your responsibility to society. This drive is embedded and founded in the culture of a company. It not only results in a profitable company but attracts motivated and inspired employees and satisfied and loyal customers, and above all it drives a better world.”

Purpose is not a campaign, purpose is your DNA. Knowing your purpose is like sequencing your DNA. It is THE distinctive driver of your company. As it is so strongly ingrained in your company, you could even argue it is engraved in individual employees’ brains. Therefore, it will influence your subconscious decision-making, your system 1 (as described by Kahneman). When planning and predicting become more complex, and drivers for change more unpredictable, wouldn’t it be a relief if we could fall back on our intuition, on our bigger purpose, to drive our strategic decisions? This could be the autonomous substitution for long-term planning.

There is no need for a long-term plan, as long as you are purpose driven, to steer system 1 decision-making.

The 2018 Clover model

For strategic plans and decisions, I have always used the Clover model (which I designed in the 90s, and explained in an earlier blog). It highlights the 4 most important questions you should ask yourself when building a strategy. It doesn’t matter where you start but the answers to all quadrants should form a coherent story. 2 dimensions define them, the internal-external dimension and the Want and Ability dimension. The questions are:

  1. INTERNAL WANT: what is your ambition? What do you want to achieve?
  2. EXTERNAL WANT: what does the customer need? What does the market want?
  3. EXTERNAL ABILITY: what is possible in the market, given the competition?
  4. INTERNAL ABILITY: which competencies do you have which will fulfill your ambition and the market need?

But this model is highly affected by all external developments. The blue ocean space is getting smaller as startups and disruptors cleverly make use of the exponentially growing new technologies and thereby change the whole ecosystem. Customer needs are changing as well. New solutions driven by technology (like AI and the Internet of Things) address underlying needs in new ways, as well as opening new needs. These rapid developments are unforeseeable, and force companies to react agilely and plan with shorter time spans.

Back to the core competencies: to feed system 2 decision making!

But what about these shorter time spans? When planning horizons are moving to 1 year or maybe even shorter, how do we maneuver in this world? I am strong believer in the Clover model for guidance in creating coherent decision-making, but increasingly I am convinced that to satisfy our system 2, we need a more logical compass; a stable fundament that will allow us to experiment with the unpredictable. The answer for me is our core competencies.

Also, with core competencies being an older buzzword in marketing, it has been jargonized and abused. I still remember the power of the concept if applied properly. The essence for me was, and is, that it is a unique combination of capabilities that is not easily copied by competitors. It is not ONE capability or ONE competence. It is the unique way your company can process, deliver, create, adopt, or achieve something that is the core of your value proposition to your customers. Or better phrased on Wikipedia: “It can be defined as “a harmonized combination of multiple resources and skills that distinguish a firm in the marketplace” and therefore are the foundation of companies’ competitiveness.”

Make Prahalad and Hamel heroes again!

Therefore, I plead for a revitalization of core competencies thinking and awareness. This should be our anchor and starting point in capturing new strategic opportunities. It should be our rudder in short-term decision-making, and our asset in collaborating with others to fulfill new customer demands.

The synergy of articulated core competencies and a purpose-driven ambition will keep us ahead of the curve.

When planning becomes too cumbersome because the external world is changing too rapidly, we should rely on our company intuition and proven strength. Our collective purpose, anchored in our DNA will steer our subconscious decision-making and satisfy our system 1 thinking. Our conscious decision making (system 2) will be satisfied with clear arguments and proven strengths, our core competencies. It is this combination, purpose and core competencies, that will drive success in a VUCA world.

* Arthur Simonetti is Marketing Director bij DSM en voorzitter van de NIMA B2B Marketing Community

How the gender pay gap impacts female marketers’ career progression

The gender pay gap, and its effect on female progression in business, is a pervasive and persistent problem that shows no signs of abating. 

According to the Office for National Statistics (ONS), the average gender pay gap for full-time female workers has been stuck at 14.1% for the past three years. The gender pay gap for women in their 20s is five times greater than it was six years ago and as it stands the pay gap means that from 10 November 2017 – Equal Pay Day – women were in effect working for free for the rest of last year.

The marketing profession is in no way immune. According to the ONS Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings, released last October, the average pay gap for marketing and sales directors is 12%, while the average pay gap for marketing associate professionals is 17.4%. The ONS defines the gender pay gap as the difference between men’s and women’s hourly earnings based on a percentage of men’s earnings.

Lees verder op Marketingweek

De vijf MVO-marketing trends voor 2018

Duurzaamheid is voor veel bedrijven een wezenlijk onderdeel van de strategie en bedrijfsvoering.

Nu de economie dit jaar volgens het CPB met meer dan 3% gaat groeien, ontstaat er extra ruimte voor bedrijven om bij te dragen aan de oplossing van maatschappelijke uitdagingen en daarmee te investeren in een stevigere marktpositie voor de lange termijn. Tegelijkertijd heerst er bij klanten scepsis ten aanzien van de duurzaamheidsclaims en intenties van bedrijven, zoals we het afgelopen jaar zagen naar aanleiding van campagnes van Pepsi, McDonald’s (in UK) en Rabobank.

Wat betekent dat voor de wijze waarop bedrijven in 2018 MVO en duurzaamheid integreren binnen hun marketinginspanningen?

Lees dit artikel van Bart Brüggenwirth op Marketingonline

Thomas Barta: Five ways to make an impact in your career

“Let’s talk about your career.” If you ever want to stop a marketer in his or her tracks, try this sentence. Of course, marketers aren’t exactly shy. When it comes to brand and campaign success, no article or blog post can be long enough. But when the talk turns to careers, most marketers keep a low profile. As a result, we don’t really talk much about careers in marketing. Perhaps we should.

It’s not all rosy. In a recent study more than 50% of all marketers said they weren’t happy with their career progress. It’s about time to talk careers.

Lees verder op Marketingweek

Dorkas Koenen: ‘Veel marketeers zijn geen marketeer maar marketinguitvoerder’

Dorkas Koenen, executive vice president marketing bij Rabobank, schreef exclusief voor Tijdschrift voor Marketing/MarketingOnline een testimonial. Heeft marketing nog wel toegevoegde waarde in deze digitale tijden? Hij ziet een kans voor de herpositionering van de marketingrol. Mits marketeers zich minder met uitvoering en meer met strategie gaan bezighouden. En verstand krijgen van cijfers.

Lees het artikel bij MarketingOnline

Trends for 2018: Purpose will morph back into positioning

‘Purpose’ has been moving up the agenda for many a marketing department over the past few years as companies look to ‘do well by doing good’. But this year saw the beginnings of a backlash. Not around doing good necessarily, but around the misappropriation of the term ‘purpose’ when in actual fact it often comes down to positioning.

So, 2018 should be the year brands move away from doing purpose for purpose’s sake (particularly when it is simply a clumsy bolt-on) and instead focus on brand differentiation through better defined positioning.

Lees verder op MarketingWeek